|
[Recent Entries][Archive][Friends][User Info] [main site] [f.a.q.] [blog roll + ...] Below are the 1 most recent journal entries recorded in the "the auroran sunset" journal:
|
01:08 pm
![[User Picture] height=](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/3328540/398316) |
why the fossil media leans left & the suburbs right an interesting speculative article attempting to explain the current state of the american political landscape in terms of demographics, with particular reference to population density:
Historically, there has been a higher perceived and practical need for government in big cities. Sewer systems, for example, are a matter of life and death in cities where diseases spread rapidly through densely packed populations. In the country, outhouses worked fine for most people until septic tanks with indoor plumbing came along, and neither needed government involvement or assistance to install and use -- except in so far as they might require permission from local regulators, who were therefore resented.
Clean and healthful running water in cities likewise entailed major public works programs as well as taxation in some form. Water in the country was usually a matter of drilling a well and was therefore untaxed. Garbage disposal in cities, required to prevent all sort of unpleasantness including vermin infestation and disease, has almost always involved government. In the country, you could burn or bury.
Crime rates, despite Hollywood's slander of the American West, have also traditionally been a more serious problem in big cities. When you can see people coming from far away and tend to know all those around you, those already accustomed to handling weapons and hunting have a different take on crime prevention than those who live among high-density strangers. and how the fossil media got that way:
The economics of the newspaper business is far more favorable to cities than to the countryside. The cost of news content production in cities, where populations are easily accessible, is much lower than it is in the countryside -- especially before the era of cheap and reliable telephones. Moreover, the cost of product distribution was dramatically less expensive in urban areas where paper boys often travel only yards, as opposed to miles in rural areas, to deliver a single, incremental newspaper.
As a result, big city newspapers thrived and the biggest city's newspaper, the New York Times, thrived most. That the journalists and editors who worked in the big city news business reflected the local political culture is not surprising. The sentiment that city folk are just a little bit smarter than country folk, or some equivalent chauvinism related to locational and team psychology, is not a conspiracy and probably couldn't have been prevented any more than you could get the majority of Green Bay Packers fans to root for New York, or vice versa. and much more。 in case you've forgotten what i mean by "that way" in reference to the fossil media:
“[...] for every journalist who contributed to George W. Bush’s campaign, another 93 contributed to Kerry’s campaign.” for recent pictorial examples of fossil media propagandising for both the declared (muslim fundies) and undeclared (socialists) enemies, see here。
Current Mood: tired Current Music: Suspect Device
|
|
|